<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The party&#8217;s over, but it&#8217;s just beginning for virtual worlds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justingibbs.com/2008/12/04/the-partys-over-but-its-just-beginning-for-virtual-worlds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justingibbs.com/2008/12/04/the-partys-over-but-its-just-beginning-for-virtual-worlds/</link>
	<description>Bringing a little drama to social games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://justingibbs.com/2008/12/04/the-partys-over-but-its-just-beginning-for-virtual-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justingibbs.com/?p=764#comment-551</guid>
		<description>So was I.  It&#039;s a nutty concept. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So was I.  It&#039;s a nutty concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justingibbs</title>
		<link>http://justingibbs.com/2008/12/04/the-partys-over-but-its-just-beginning-for-virtual-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>justingibbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justingibbs.com/?p=764#comment-533</guid>
		<description>I was just alludeing to the recent headlines - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/12/01/business/markets.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Dow plunges 680 points as U.S. recession is decla...&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just alludeing to the recent headlines &#8211; <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/12/01/business/markets.php" target="_blank">Dow plunges 680 points as U.S. recession is decla&#8230;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D-Lo</title>
		<link>http://justingibbs.com/2008/12/04/the-partys-over-but-its-just-beginning-for-virtual-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>D-Lo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justingibbs.com/?p=764#comment-531</guid>
		<description>I get what you’re saying but I’m not quite following your logic. I’m going to assume that you just need to relabel a few of your terms then your point can be made more clear.

    What I’m hearing is this…

    This “dream world” of good economic times (good times that seemed to just slip right by me btw) are over. And it’s going to be a long hard climb out of the pit. And since Entertainment (Movies and TV in particular) is usually our culture’s fallback in these times we will fall back on it again. Except that said Entertainment is only escapism. Therefore we should retreat into a virtual world that combines this entertainment (escapism) with dream worlds.

    The main problem is the tone at the beginning of your article seems to carry with it a denigratory tone in relation to people and their ability to escape the cold hard facts that only you, Krugman, and Baker seem wise enough to realized. But then you turn around, with party hats on, and celebrate the inevitable oncoming rise of dreamworlds because the other dreamworld is dying.

    Correct me if I’m wrong but that not only sounds self-serving (which I actually have no problem with. That’s what business is all about) but also a bit manic. To sell your idea better you should identify your thesis then like a crafty skilled salesman manipulate your audience into throwing in. The way it is now, you’re saying “Awesome, things are dying because everyone bough beachfront property in the desert! Now, would you like to buy some beach front property in the desert, because if you do it can make me rich!”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get what you’re saying but I’m not quite following your logic. I’m going to assume that you just need to relabel a few of your terms then your point can be made more clear.</p>
<p>    What I’m hearing is this…</p>
<p>    This “dream world” of good economic times (good times that seemed to just slip right by me btw) are over. And it’s going to be a long hard climb out of the pit. And since Entertainment (Movies and TV in particular) is usually our culture’s fallback in these times we will fall back on it again. Except that said Entertainment is only escapism. Therefore we should retreat into a virtual world that combines this entertainment (escapism) with dream worlds.</p>
<p>    The main problem is the tone at the beginning of your article seems to carry with it a denigratory tone in relation to people and their ability to escape the cold hard facts that only you, Krugman, and Baker seem wise enough to realized. But then you turn around, with party hats on, and celebrate the inevitable oncoming rise of dreamworlds because the other dreamworld is dying.</p>
<p>    Correct me if I’m wrong but that not only sounds self-serving (which I actually have no problem with. That’s what business is all about) but also a bit manic. To sell your idea better you should identify your thesis then like a crafty skilled salesman manipulate your audience into throwing in. The way it is now, you’re saying “Awesome, things are dying because everyone bough beachfront property in the desert! Now, would you like to buy some beach front property in the desert, because if you do it can make me rich!”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D-Lo</title>
		<link>http://justingibbs.com/2008/12/04/the-partys-over-but-its-just-beginning-for-virtual-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>D-Lo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justingibbs.com/?p=764#comment-529</guid>
		<description>I get what you&#039;re saying but I&#039;m not quite following your logic.  I&#039;m going to assume that you just need to relabel a few of your terms then your point can be made more clear.

What I&#039;m hearing is this...

This &quot;dream world&quot; of good economic times (good times that seemed to just slip right by me btw) are over. And it&#039;s going to be a long hard climb out of the pit.  And since Entertainment (Movies and TV in particular) is usually our culture&#039;s fallback in these times we will fall back on it again.  Except that said Entertainment is only escapism.  Therefore we should retreat into a virtual world that combines this entertainment (escapism) with dream worlds.

The main problem is the tone at the beginning of your article seems to carry with it a denigratory tone in relation to people and their ability to escape the cold hard facts that only you, Krugman, and Baker seem wise enough to realized.  But then you turn around, with party hats on, and celebrate the inevitable oncoming rise of dreamworlds because the other dreamworld is dying.

Correct me if I&#039;m wrong but that not only sounds self-serving (which I actually have no problem with.  That&#039;s what business is all about) but also a bit manic.  To sell your idea better you should identify your thesis then like a crafty skilled salesman manipulate your audience into throwing in.  The way it is now, you&#039;re saying &quot;Awesome, things are dying because everyone bough beachfront property in the desert!  Now, would you like to buy some beach front property in the desert, because if you do it can make me rich!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get what you&#8217;re saying but I&#8217;m not quite following your logic.  I&#8217;m going to assume that you just need to relabel a few of your terms then your point can be made more clear.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m hearing is this&#8230;</p>
<p>This &#8220;dream world&#8221; of good economic times (good times that seemed to just slip right by me btw) are over. And it&#8217;s going to be a long hard climb out of the pit.  And since Entertainment (Movies and TV in particular) is usually our culture&#8217;s fallback in these times we will fall back on it again.  Except that said Entertainment is only escapism.  Therefore we should retreat into a virtual world that combines this entertainment (escapism) with dream worlds.</p>
<p>The main problem is the tone at the beginning of your article seems to carry with it a denigratory tone in relation to people and their ability to escape the cold hard facts that only you, Krugman, and Baker seem wise enough to realized.  But then you turn around, with party hats on, and celebrate the inevitable oncoming rise of dreamworlds because the other dreamworld is dying.</p>
<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong but that not only sounds self-serving (which I actually have no problem with.  That&#8217;s what business is all about) but also a bit manic.  To sell your idea better you should identify your thesis then like a crafty skilled salesman manipulate your audience into throwing in.  The way it is now, you&#8217;re saying &#8220;Awesome, things are dying because everyone bough beachfront property in the desert!  Now, would you like to buy some beach front property in the desert, because if you do it can make me rich!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://justingibbs.com/2008/12/04/the-partys-over-but-its-just-beginning-for-virtual-worlds/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justingibbs.com/?p=764#comment-532</guid>
		<description>The only thing crazier than you announcing that we&#039;re in a recession is the notion of it being official.  Either you can pay your mortgage or you can&#039;t, and I think that standard has been &quot;official&quot; for a lot of people for a long time.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing crazier than you announcing that we&#039;re in a recession is the notion of it being official.  Either you can pay your mortgage or you can&#039;t, and I think that standard has been &quot;official&quot; for a lot of people for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
